Concerns The infinite cycles of universe
           according to Big Bang - Big Crunch model.
           (Is there any place for creator? )

              Let’s continue with the attempt to disprove the concept of “Beginning and Ending” itself. Why do we think everything has its beginning and its end? Is it because of our reason ? If it is, then are we sure that all our reasons are valid? As I discussed before, we destroyed our previous reason and develop our new reason from our knowledge of Relativity. Now, we shall seek
          the argument to this reason of “Beginning and Ending”. Let’s look at all thing around us, every thing seems to have its Beginning and Ending. But that is just a very limited scope of universe that we could observe. First, we must accept the fact that the length of human’s life is so short compare to the stars and macroscopic universe. It is to short to observe and construct the reason based upon the true nature of universe. We based our reasons upon our ability to understand and to observe the universe. Unfortunately, many of the recent scientific understandings of the universe are not yet apply to the general public. That is to say we basically view every physical events in our life more or less in the scope of Newtonian Physics’ view of universe. What is the Newtonian view of the universe then? Newtonian view is basically the understanding of
          events in term of our general experiences. That is to say people think time and space are absolute and could be separated. Time flow constantly and space (3 dimensions) remain in constant no matter at what speed it travel. Such as to say 1 minute on earth is the same with 1 minute on the surface of the sun if we use the same watch, or to say no matter at what speed I’m running, my 3 dimensional body remains in the same proportion. There can not be something out of
          nothing. All things must have its beginning and its ending. Those example of some ideas are Newtonian view of universe. Which, by our knowledge in Quantum Physics and Relativity, all relatively wrong. I believe that my article would be a good introduction to “Quantum
          Logic” for the readers. In order to develop a new logic or reason on the topic of “Beginning and Ending” let’s make a journey into the realm of macroscopic physics. The Physics of the universe as a whole.

              Our field that we interested in this branch of science is of that “Big Bang – Big Crunch Theory”. Although, we must accept that this theory is not yet proved in all its structures. But it is the theory that is commonly acceptable among leading physicists. The recent complains on Big Bang Theory are due to the discovery that instead of the universe reducing its size after the gravity of masses overcome the first expanding force in Big Bang. And also many recent theories
          attack Big Bang Theory. But there are no other theory yet that could overcome the Big Bang and it seems that those problems due to the structure of the classical big bang theory not its concept. The very interesting approach to those problem could be of the dark matters and the 4 dimensional boom-burst cycles are just part of beyond 4 dimensional interpretation of Superstring theory.Since, no one could really disprove Big Bang theory. Let’s continue
          our journey. First (which we would soon see that it is not really the original “first” but just a relative “first”), the universe was in a very dense and hot state which mainly caused the fusion nuclear reaction. It Bang out in every dimension which we could relatively compare it to a balloon which is expanding. As we all know, the heat is also a reaction from the fast-moving particles. Since, it’s so hot in the first stage, no possible particle’s connection could be form.
          After the temperature cool down, it formed some basic chemical connection from a single atom of Hydrogen to Molecule and to Matter. From gas to matter. As you remember, since E = mc^2, there always be all sort of particles in the universe even in the beginning but it could not forms many kind of molecule etc… The warmer the universe, the more matter in the universe. The universe would expand until the total force of all matters’ gravity overcome the first “Big Bang”
          force that spread the universe outward. After the great overcome, the universe will reduces its size. It will shrink faster and faster due to the increasing gravitational force. At the end (relative end) the universe would  crunches into itself as one play the big bang in reverse. Because the universe sucks itself with a tremendous speed, it creates two possibilities. It could end up as singularity which would be an infinitely small point with an infinitely mass. All known laws in Physics would not be valid anymore. Or another more acceptable possibility, with our great development on the Inflationary universe theory, because of the situation in the state of big crunch, it would create another big bang. It would be the cycles of infinite big bangs and big crunches.

              At this point, it destroyed all our concepts of  “Beginning and Ending”, since there is no real Ending or Beginning but just a relative one. Therefore, in macroscopic, the reality that concern
          time is infinite, not finite.  Although, this is not a cut and dry understanding, it require a lot more detailed study because of its strangeness. Anyhow, this serve as our good introduction to the infinite logic which overcome our finite (Beginning and the ending of the universe) one.For a further study on the subject I strongly recommend “The brief history of time” by Stephen Hawking. Or such a home page as Stephen Hawking’s universe at

             http://www.pbs.org/wnet/hawking/html/home.html.

              It would serve as a good introduction to the study of the subject. It will show you that all those concepts I described above is just a small part of this field. Now, let’s continue to our attempt to solve another Newtonian logic of  “Some thing could not create from nothing” or “There must be an creator in order to have every thing.”. These statements would lead you to some understanding on “Quantum Physics”, which if, you still have your interests and continue reading it.

          Continue
           - Concerns the misconception of nothingness according to Quantum physics. (If there is no god, how could we exist?)

          Back



          Copyright (c) 1999 by Sunit Shrestha.